4 Keys to Ensuring PLM Adoption

Enterprise_adoption

Business and IT leaders know well that education and training are essential to the success of technology-based solutions. PLM (product lifecyle management) is no exception. If managers and end users don’t learn and adopt new ways of working with PLM solutions, the best software in the world is of little value.

All too often, however, companies short-change investments in programs to ensure adoption of their new solutions.

The justifications for minimizing adoption budgets often sound plausible: Our people can figure it out themselves; the tool is not that complicated; we’ll train a few super users and let them train everyone else.

But the consequences of under-funding can be dramatic. New processes are ignored, paid-for licenses go unused, duplicative work and error rates continue, and promised performance gains fail to materialize.

Adequate budgets are part of the answer. Industry benchmarks suggest that companies dedicating at least 15 percent of overall PLM investments to adoption programs receive far more business benefit than companies that fail to meet that threshold.

Executive advocacy is also critical, as Cynthia Ridley from Kalypso explained recently.

Just as important, though, is how you invest.

New research from Tech-Clarity and PTC points to four specific ways in which high performers stand apart from other companies with their learning and adoption programs for PLM.

  1. Strategic planning: High performers are much more likely than other companies to create a strategic plan for training and adoption as part of their overall program planning for PLM, rather than simply organizing training programs once the new system goes live (63 percent vs. 41 percent).
  2. Company awareness: High performers are more likely to invest in company-wide communications programs to build awareness of the need for change, the nature of the change, and the value of the new solution (59 percent vs. 45 percent).
  3. Role-based training: High performers are much more likely to invest in customized training for people and work groups based on their different roles and responsibilities rather than providing one-size-fits-all training on software features and functions (51 percent vs. 31 percent).
  4. Test environment: High performers are much more likely to create a training or “sandbox” test environment for managers and end users to explore different aspects of the new system before it goes live (51 percent vs. 19 percent).

Relegating “training” to a HR-driven afterthought while program leaders focus on implementation may seem like a reasonable way to manage, but the data show that investing the right way in learning and adoption makes a huge contribution to ultimate business value. As is so often the case with major technology solutions, the fundamentals of change management continue to reign supreme.

The Tech-Clarity/PTC Global Services study will be available later this summer. Contact Rob Leavitt at rleavitt@ptc.com for more information.

About Rob Leavitt

Rob Leavitt is Director of Thought Leadership at PTC Global Services, the consulting arm of PTC. A long-time advisor to top technology and IT services firms, Rob works with PTC consultants, partners, and customers to advance understanding of key issues and challenges in product development, manufacturing, and after-market service. Follow Rob on Twitter at @PTC_Consulting.
This entry was posted in Strategy. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to 4 Keys to Ensuring PLM Adoption

  1. Mahesh Beri says:

    I agree fully that “Company awareness:” is so important.

    In fact I have seen at times training budget or licenses not being a constraint. However getting people use PLM solutions in the way it is intended itself is a huge. People are so overwhelmed with enterprise tools, that pains in adopting PLM should reduced with effective training and user acceptance tests.

    Also it is a challenge how often the functions are used after go-live .. Every day, occasional use etc ..Based on product development events, some business processes take months to reoccur.
    Re-training is equally important in such cases.
    -Mahesh

    • Rob Leavitt says:

      Thanks Mahesh. I would agree that budget is not the only issue, although it is common, unfortunately, that companies fail to allocate enough resources to learning and adoption. Your point about people being overwhelmed with new tools is a great one, too, and I’d suggest that companies do need to think very carefully about the sequencing of new rollouts overall as well as the awareness building, training, and support for each individual new tool. We actually have several significant new tools being rolled out here at PTC in the coming months and the sequencing and coordination across these programs has been a big issue.

      • Bipin Shah says:

        There is no one way street two way is better then one way and our five finger are not the same. Teacher and students has a diffirent set mind. Product is good but user are diffirent PTC should have simplyfied verson and on line training. Cost cutting is good but not always is effective as looks. Some time it creates more problem than it looks.

  2. i sometime feel the end user adoption requires a huge amount of investment,it only not depends on time but quality of training content.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s